<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Phocean.net &#187; TLS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phocean.net/tag/tls/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phocean.net</link>
	<description>Crusing for Knowledge, Drifting towards Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:57:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SSL/TLS RFC updated against CVE-2009-3555</title>
		<link>http://www.phocean.net/2010/01/09/ssltls-rfc-updated-against-cve-2009-3555.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.phocean.net/2010/01/09/ssltls-rfc-updated-against-cve-2009-3555.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openSUSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IETF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mod-ssl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phocean.net/?p=673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A solution has been finally brought up to fix CVE-2009-3555 and the temporary solution that broke client authentication. At least, the IETF agreed on a fix as Marsh Ray informs us, though it will still take some weeks for the whole validation process to complete. Moreover, as it requires both the servers and the clients [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A solution has been finally brought up to fix<a href="http://www.phocean.net/2009/11/28/openssl-cve-2009-3555-security-fix-and-mod_ssl-client-authentication-breakage.html"> CVE-2009-3555 and the temporary solution that broke client authentication</a>.</p>
<p>At least, the IETF agreed on a fix as <a title="SSL/TLS fix" href="http://extendedsubset.com/?p=14" target="_blank">Marsh Ray</a> informs us, though it will still take some weeks for the whole validation process to complete.</p>
<p>Moreover, as it requires both the servers and the clients to be patched, it will take months before the patches can be applied and one can have a working client authentification architecture. The longest will be the client side, of course, so I feel sorry for those who have a large park to manage.</p>
<p>As far as I am concerned, fortunately, I will just have a few browsers that I manage directly to update. Anyway, still more patience is needed !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.phocean.net/2010/01/09/ssltls-rfc-updated-against-cve-2009-3555.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postfix : TLS not working outside my network</title>
		<link>http://www.phocean.net/2008/06/11/postfix-tls-not-working-outside-my-network.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.phocean.net/2008/06/11/postfix-tls-not-working-outside-my-network.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewalling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phocean.net/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I just finished setting TLS and SASL to secure the access to my Postfix server, I realized that it was working only from inside my network. What I got from my lan : $ telnet mars 25 Trying 192.168.222.10... Connected to phocean.net. Escape character is '^]'. 220 phocean.net ESMTP Postfix (Debian/GNU) ehlo phocean.net 250-phocean.net [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I just finished setting TLS and SASL to secure the access to my Postfix server, I realized that it was working only from inside my network.</p>
<p>What I got from my lan :</p>
<pre class="brush: plain;">$ telnet mars 25
Trying 192.168.222.10...
Connected to phocean.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 phocean.net ESMTP Postfix (Debian/GNU)
ehlo phocean.net
250-phocean.net
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 200000000
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-STARTTLS
250-AUTH NTLM DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8BITMIME
250 DSN</pre>
<p>I shows well that the TLS handshake is initiated.</p>
<p>But from this outside, I just got this weired thing :</p>
<pre class="brush: plain;">$ telnet phocean.net 25
Trying 81.64.194.119...
Connected to phocean.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 **********************************************
ehlo phocean.net
502 5.5.2 Error: command not recognized</pre>
<p>Of course, the firewall, a Cisco Pix one, was properly set to redirect port 25 UDP/TCP to my server.</p>
<p>However, I soon focused my effort on this equipment. I considered a while that the cause could be some filtering from my provider, but most probably, the problem came from the Pix.</p>
<p>That was not difficult to figure out : it had some protocol inspector activated for SMTP :</p>
<pre class="brush: plain;">$ sh ru
[...]
fixup protocol smtp 25
[...]</pre>
<p>Just after :</p>
<pre class="brush: plain;">&gt; no fixup protocol smtp 25</pre>
<p>&#8230; it started to work perfectly well !!!</p>
<p>The engine for the SMTP protocol could not recognize the TLS handshake, considered that the SMTP session as not valid and therefore blocked it !</p>
<p>I can deactivate it without any fear as my Postfix server is already pretty well secured, or at least configured to reject any weired SMTP dialog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.phocean.net/2008/06/11/postfix-tls-not-working-outside-my-network.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
